Across

What Across is (and why bridges are a points magnet)

Across is a cross-chain bridge. Bridges move value between networks, and that makes them a common “quest” surface in points programs. Campaigns like bridges because they can measure activity cleanly (deposits, routes, and volume), and users often need to bridge to participate in other apps.

For users, the key trade-off is also simple: bridging is one of the highest-risk actions in DeFi. You are relying on infrastructure that can fail in ways a single-chain swap cannot.

What we track for Across on DeFi Farmer

On this page we focus on:

• program timelines and verification timestamps;
• sources and safer link-outs (so you don’t end up on a phishing bridge UI);
• editorial notes when a program is unclear or changed.

We don’t promise outcomes and we don’t recommend routes. We try to give you enough structured context to make your own call.

The bridge risks that points farmers underestimate

Link and impersonation risk

Bridge UIs are heavily targeted by phishing campaigns. A “bridge for points” narrative increases the click-through rate for attackers.

Treat link safety as part of your strategy. Start from official sources, and be cautious about sponsored search results and social replies.

Practical ways to reduce phishing risk:

• Use bookmarked official URLs; avoid typing domains from memory.
• Don’t trust “claim” links in replies. Go to the official site directly.
• If a page asks for unexpected approvals or signatures, stop and re-verify the URL.

Cross-chain finality and assumptions

Bridging is not a single risk; it is a stack:

• source chain risk;
• destination chain risk;
• bridge contract risk;
• relayer / messaging risk;
• operational risk (wrong chain, wrong token, wrong address).

Points don’t reduce any of these. If a campaign’s only value prop is “bridge for points,” you’re being paid in uncertainty for taking real risk.

Cost and timing surprises

Bridging costs are not only “bridge fee.” They also include:

• gas on the source chain;
• gas on the destination chain;
• price impact if you swap before/after;
• opportunity cost if funds are delayed.

Use the tool to compare routes and trade-offs before you move funds: Bridge optimizer and the guide: Bridge fee comparison.

What to verify before you do a bridge quest

If a points program tells you to bridge, you should be able to answer these before you start:

• Which chains count? Some campaigns only count specific source/destination chains.
• Which token counts? “Bridge anything” is rare; more often a specific asset matters.
• Is there a minimum size? Some programs have minimums, thresholds, or anti-sybil rules.
• Is it time-bound? Look for season cutoffs and snapshot windows.

If you can’t find these details in official sources, treat the rules as unknown and avoid over-optimizing.

Also, keep “proof” like a safety engineer. Save the source tx hash, the destination tx hash (if applicable), timestamps, and any quest UI screenshots. Cross-chain indexing can lag, and when it does, the only way to debug is to show exactly what happened and when.

If a program mentions sybil rules, avoid splitting activity across many wallets. It often makes eligibility harder to prove, not easier.

A safer workflow for bridging (campaign or not)

1. Verify the URL using official sources on this page.
2. Confirm destination address formatting and chain selection. Don’t “copy/paste” blindly across chains.
3. Start small when you’re testing a new route. A single mistake can be irreversible.
4. Keep records (tx hashes, times, amounts). See: Questing recordkeeping template.
5. Have an exit plan. If a campaign forces you to bridge into a chain you don’t want to stay on, understand how you will unwind. See: Points farming exit plan.

FAQ (Across + points)

Is bridging for points ever “worth it”?

Sometimes, but only you can decide. You should compare the risk and friction of bridging to the uncertainty of points. If you are new to bridges, treat points incentives as a reason to slow down, not speed up.

How do I verify an Across-related campaign is real?

Use: How to verify a points program is real. Look for official UI evidence and official announcements, and avoid relying on aggregator sites.

What’s the most common bridge mistake?

Using the wrong link or sending to the wrong chain/address. Most bridge losses are operational.

What if I bridged but the campaign doesn’t show credit?

Points systems can lag, and some campaigns only count specific routes. This is why recordkeeping matters. Save your tx hashes and timestamps, and verify whether the rules mention snapshots or delayed indexing.

Official references (primary sources)

• Website: across.to
• Bridge app: app.across.to
• Docs: docs.across.to
• X / Twitter: @AcrossProtocol

Next steps

• Compare routes and fees: Bridge optimizer
• Browse bridge-related programs: Bridge category
• Browse all programs: Points directory